Skip to main content

Featured

Canada Lifts Terror Designation on Syria’s Transitional Government

Syria’s interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa speaks at a joint news conference with French President Emmanuel Macron after their meeting at the Élysée Palace in Paris on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. Canada has announced a significant policy shift by removing Syria and its interim governing group from its terrorism-related sanctions lists . The decision comes nearly a year after the ouster of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, whose regime had been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 2012. Key Developments Syria delisted : Ottawa has officially taken Syria off its list of foreign state supporters of terrorism. HTS removed : Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the Islamist-led faction that assumed control after Assad’s fall, has also been removed from Canada’s list of terrorist entities under the Criminal Code. Government stance : Canadian ministers emphasized that the move was made after extensive consultations with international allies and is intended to encourage Syria’s tra...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

OAS Boost: A Misaligned Solution to Seniors’ Financial Struggles

 


The federal government’s decision to increase Old Age Security (OAS) payments in October 2025 has sparked debate about whether the measure truly addresses the needs of Canada’s most vulnerable seniors. While the Canada Revenue Agency confirmed that some retirees will see up to a $742 boost in their annual OAS payments, critics argue that the increase is poorly targeted—helping too little where it’s most needed, and too much where it’s not.

OAS is a universal, residency-based benefit available to Canadians aged 65 and older, regardless of income. Unlike the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), which is income-tested, OAS is taxable and subject to a recovery tax only for higher-income seniors (those earning above $90,997 in 2024). This means that even relatively affluent retirees will benefit from the increase, while low-income seniors—who rely heavily on OAS and GIS to cover essentials like food, rent, and medication—may still find the boost insufficient to keep pace with inflation.

The government justifies the adjustment as part of its quarterly indexation process, designed to protect seniors’ purchasing power against rising costs of living . However, the uniform nature of the increase raises concerns about fairness and efficiency. For wealthier retirees, the extra funds may simply add to discretionary spending, while for those living below the poverty line, the additional amount may barely cover the rising cost of groceries.

A more effective approach, some experts suggest, would be to direct larger increases toward GIS recipients and lower-income seniors, ensuring that public funds are used where they can make the greatest impact. Without such targeting, the OAS boost risks being a blunt instrument—politically popular, but economically imprecise.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment