Skip to main content

Featured

Air Transat Faces Flight Suspensions Amid Pilot Strike Notice

  Air Transat has announced it will gradually suspend flights starting Monday following a 72-hour strike notice issued by its pilots’ union. The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), representing roughly 700 pilots, delivered the notice after nearly a year of unsuccessful negotiations with the airline’s parent company, Transat A.T. Inc. Background The union filed the strike notice on Sunday, giving pilots the legal right to walk off the job as early as Wednesday. Last week, pilots voted 99% in favor of strike action , underscoring their frustration over stalled contract talks. ALPA leaders emphasized that pilots do not want to strike but feel compelled to act after management failed to meet demands for a modernized agreement. Airline Response Air Transat confirmed it will begin suspending flights gradually between December 8 and 9 to prepare for a possible full shutdown. The company stated it is working “around the clock” to reach a deal and minimize disruption for trave...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Trump Seeks ‘Absolute Immunity’ for Ex-Presidents: Legal Battle Heads to Supreme Court


In a significant legal maneuver, former President Donald Trump has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to grant him “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for his official acts during his tenure. The case, set to be argued before the justices on April 25, has far-reaching implications for presidential accountability and the delicate balance between executive power and legal scrutiny.

Trump’s legal team contends that a former president should enjoy absolute immunity from criminal charges related to official actions taken while in office. They argue that subjecting ex-presidents to criminal prosecution would hinder the functioning of the presidency and compromise its independence. According to their filing, “The president cannot function, and the presidency itself cannot retain its vital independence, if the president faces criminal prosecution for official acts once he leaves office.”

The legal battle stems from a criminal case initiated by Special Counsel Jack Smith. In August 2023, Smith brought federal criminal charges against Trump, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstructing the congressional certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory, and conspiring against Americans’ right to vote. These charges relate to Trump’s alleged efforts to subvert the electoral process and remain in power.

Trump’s case marks the first time a former president faces criminal prosecution. If the Supreme Court rules in his favor, it could set a precedent for future ex-presidents. However, opponents argue that granting absolute immunity would undermine accountability and allow presidents to evade legal consequences for their actions.

Special Counsel Smith emphasizes the compelling public interest in seeing the charges brought to trial promptly. He contends that the alleged crimes strike at the heart of democracy and that a former president charged with subverting the electoral process should not escape accountability.

As the legal battle unfolds, the Supreme Court’s decision will shape the boundaries of presidential immunity and impact the delicate balance between executive power and the rule of law. The outcome will reverberate through history, affecting not only Trump but also future occupants of the Oval Office.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment