Skip to main content

Featured

Sept 15 Tariff Shift: What's Actually Changing on Canadian Goods (And What Isn't)

  Published September 12, 2026 At 12:01 a.m. ET on Tuesday, September 15, a new round of U.S. tariff changes takes effect on Canadian goods. If you've seen headlines calling this a "new 50% tariff on Canadian steel, aluminum and paper," here's the more accurate story: it isn't a new tariff at all. It's the U.S. reshuffling which products fall under a 50% tariff that's already been in place since August 22 — adding some categories, removing others, on the same day. Here's what's actually happening, and why it matters more to Canadian manufacturers and cross-border shoppers than to your everyday grocery bill. The tariff this modifies Back on August 22, 2026, the U.S. imposed a 50% tariff under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on roughly $20 billion CAD of Canadian goods. The White House framed it as retaliation for Canadian "discrimination" against U.S. alcoholic beverages, dairy, and motor vehicles — three separate proclamations, eac...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Starbucks Challenges Labor Agency in Supreme Court Case


In a significant legal battle, Starbucks is facing off against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case centers around the company’s decision to fire seven workers who were actively involved in unionization efforts at a Tennessee store. Here are the key details:

  1. Background:

    • After Starbucks dismissed the seven workers for their unionization activities, the NLRB obtained a court order requiring the company to rehire them.
    • Now, Starbucks is seeking to limit the government’s power in such cases by challenging the NLRB’s actions.

  2. Supreme Court Hearing:

    • Justices are scheduled to hear Starbucks’ case against the NLRB.
    • If the court rules in favor of Starbucks, it could make it more difficult for the NLRB to intervene when it alleges corporate interference in unionization efforts.

  3. The Controversy:

    • Starbucks argues that the NLRB’s standards for requesting temporary injunctions against companies lack consistency across federal appeals courts.
    • Temporary injunctions can be burdensome for companies, as the NLRB’s administrative process can take years.

  4. Current Status:

    • Five of the seven workers involved in the case are still employed at the Memphis store, while the other two remain committed to the organizing effort.
    • The Memphis store voted to unionize in June 2022, but no labor agreement has been reached with Starbucks for any of the 420 company-owned U.S. stores that have voted to unionize since late 2021.

  5. Looking Ahead:

    • The hearing comes at a time when relations between Starbucks and Workers United (the union representing its workers) have improved. Both sides have resumed talks with the goal of reaching contract agreements this year.
    • The Supreme Court’s decision could have broader implications for labor rights and corporate accountability in unionization efforts.

In summary, Starbucks’ legal battle with the NLRB highlights the tension between corporate interests and workers’ rights. The outcome of this case could shape future labor disputes and the role of federal agencies in protecting employees’ right to organize.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment