Skip to main content

Featured

The Fed Decides Wednesday — Here's What It Means for Your Mortgage, the Loonie, and Your RRSP

  Monday, July 27, 2026 The U.S. Federal Reserve hands down its rate decision at 2 p.m. ET on July 29. For most Canadians it will feel like background noise. It isn't — here's the plain-language version of why it touches your mortgage, your cross-border spending, and whatever's sitting in your RRSP. The short version: Markets are pricing roughly a two-in-three chance the Fed holds its rate at 3.50%–3.75% on Wednesday. That's not the story. The story is that this is one of the least certain "sure thing" holds in years — and Chair Kevin Warsh's press conference at 2:30 p.m. ET could matter more than the decision itself. Why this meeting is different The Fed has held its benchmark rate steady at 3.50%–3.75% through every meeting so far in 2026. On paper, Wednesday should be more of the same. Under the hood, it's messier. Persistent inflation, running well above the Fed's 2% target for a fifth straight year, has kept a rate hike on the table. The oil-...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity: Key Implications for Donald Trump

 

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on immunity has significant implications for presidential power and accountability. Here are some key facts from the ruling:

  1. Presidential Immunity: The majority ruling states that presidents, including former President Donald Trump, have immunity from criminal prosecution when carrying out “official acts.” However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision is based on the constitutional separation of powers and the nature of presidential authority.

  2. Partisan Split: The ruling fell along partisan lines, with the six conservative justices voting in favor of immunity and the three liberal justices dissenting.

  3. Impact on Trump: In the short term, this ruling almost certainly helps Trump avoid further trials before the 2024 general election. The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to determine which elements of the indictment count as official and unofficial acts. Trump can use this opinion as a defense.

  4. Campaign Trail: Given the ongoing presidential campaign, this issue is likely to be a topic of discussion. Both political parties have raised concerns about perceived abuses of presidential power.

  5. Public Perception: By stating that presidents are not immune from prosecution for personal acts, the court emphasizes that the highest office in the land is subject to the same legal standards as everyone else.

In summary, the ruling creates a balance between immunity for official acts and accountability for personal conduct, impacting Trump’s pending criminal cases and shaping the public’s view of presidential power. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment