Skip to main content

Featured

Is It Still Worth Buying a Rental Property in Ontario in 2026?

  Published: April 2026 | Reading time: 12 min | Category: Real Estate, Investing, Personal Finance A few years ago the answer seemed obvious. Ontario real estate only went up, rents kept climbing, and landlords looked like geniuses. Then interest rates spiked, prices corrected, rent growth slowed in some markets, and suddenly the question got a lot more complicated. So is buying a rental property in Ontario still a good investment in 2026? The honest answer is: it depends entirely on the numbers, the market, and your personal financial situation. This article gives you the full picture — the real math, the real risks, and a clear framework for deciding whether it makes sense for you. The Case For Rental Property in Ontario in 2026 Before diving into the challenges, here is why real estate remains compelling for long-term investors. Ontario's population is still growing fast Ontario added over 500,000 people in 2023 alone — one of the fastest population growth rates in ...

article

Trump Administration Repeals Biden-Era Order on U.S.-Supplied Weapons and Human Rights

 

In a significant policy shift, the Trump administration has rescinded a Biden-era order that required the U.S. government to report potential violations of international law involving U.S.-supplied weapons by allies, including Israel. The order, known as National Security Memorandum-20 (NSM-20), was signed by former President Joe Biden in February 2024 amid concerns over Israel's use of American bombs in its war in Gaza.

NSM-20 mandated that the U.S. government produce reports for Congress on the use of U.S. arms by other countries, ensuring that these weapons were not used in violation of international humanitarian law. However, the Trump administration, through an order issued by White House National Security Adviser Michael Waltz on February 21, has repealed this memorandum.

The decision has sparked controversy, with U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, a key proponent of congressional oversight of U.S. arms sales, calling the move "shameful" and a disservice to national security and global human rights. Van Hollen emphasized that the revocation undermines American taxpayers' right to ensure their dollars align with U.S. laws and national interests.

The Trump administration's decision to rescind NSM-20 has raised concerns about the credibility of assurances from U.S. allies, such as Israel, regarding their adherence to international humanitarian law when using U.S.-supplied weapons. Critics argue that this move reflects a blatant indifference to American values and a retreat from the principles of human rights and accountability.


Comments