Skip to main content

Featured

Trump's 50% Auto Tariff Threat: What It Means If You're Buying a Car in 2027

  Vehicle prices in Canada are already up thousands of dollars since the trade war began. A threatened doubling of auto tariffs on January 1, 2027 could push them higher still — here's what's confirmed, what's not, and what it means if you're in the market for a car. On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that tariffs on all Canadian-made cars, trucks, auto parts, and steel would rise to 50% starting January 1, 2027 — effectively doubling the current 25% rate. The threat landed hours after cross-border trade talks collapsed late Friday night, triggering a separate round of 50% tariffs on roughly $20 billion of other Canadian goods and a promised Canadian retaliation package set for September 8. For anyone shopping for a new or used vehicle in Ontario — or watching an auto-sector paycheque — here's what's actually changed, and what's still just a threat. What Trump actually announced The post is specific on rate and date but light on me...

article

Historic Legal Showdown: Fed Governor Lisa Cook Challenges Trump’s Attempted Firing

 

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeking to overturn what she calls an “illegal and unprecedented” attempt to remove her from the central bank’s Board of Governors.

The dispute erupted after President Donald Trump announced on social media that he was firing Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud dating back to 2021, before her Senate confirmation. Cook, the first Black woman to serve as a Fed governor, has not been charged with any crime and denies the allegations.

Under the Federal Reserve Act, a president can only remove a governor “for cause,” a standard generally interpreted to mean serious misconduct or neglect of duty. Legal experts note that no president in the Fed’s 112-year history has attempted such a removal, and the law’s definition of “cause” has never been tested in court.

Cook’s lawsuit argues that the allegations are a political pretext aimed at reshaping the Fed’s policymaking body, as she has consistently opposed Trump’s calls for deeper interest rate cuts. A federal judge has scheduled a hearing for Friday, setting the stage for a potentially landmark ruling on the Fed’s independence.

If the courts side with Trump, analysts warn it could erode the central bank’s political autonomy — a cornerstone of its ability to make unpopular but necessary economic decisions.

Comments