Skip to main content

Featured

Ukraine’s Neptune Missiles Strike Novorossiysk Port, Damaging Key Russian Infrastructure

  Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy awards a Ukrainian serviceman while he visits a command position of the 65th Separate Mechanized Brigade 'Velykyi Luh' at a front line, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Zaporizhzhia region, Ukraine November 13, 2025. Ukrainian forces carried out a significant overnight strike on Russia’s Black Sea port of Novorossiysk , using domestically produced Neptune cruise missiles . The attack, which took place on the night of November 13–14, 2025 , targeted strategic military and energy facilities in the port city of Krasnodar Krai. According to Ukraine’s General Staff, the strike damaged valuable port infrastructure , including the Sheskharis oil terminal , a launcher from Russia’s S-400 air defense system , and a missile storage site. The latter reportedly detonated, causing fires across the port area. Video footage and reports confirmed that drones accompanied the missile barrage, amplifying the destruction. President Volodymyr ...

article

Tariff Shock: How Trump’s 10% Bus Duty Threatens North American Transit Budgets


Cities across North America are bracing for a financial squeeze as U.S. President Donald Trump’s new 10% tariff on imported buses takes effect this week. The measure, part of a broader tariff package on heavy and medium-sized trucks, is expected to ripple through municipal budgets already stretched thin.

Transit agencies rely heavily on cross-border supply chains, with buses and their components often crossing the U.S.-Canada border multiple times before final assembly. This deep integration of the bus manufacturing industry means the tariff will not only raise costs for U.S. cities but also for Canadian municipalities that source vehicles from American manufacturers.

The added expense could force cities to make tough choices. Property taxes, transit fares, parking fees, and even congestion charges are all on the table as potential revenue streams to offset the higher costs. For riders, this could translate into fare hikes or reduced service, undermining efforts to expand public transit and shift toward greener fleets.

The timing is particularly challenging. Many transit agencies are in the midst of fleet renewal programs, with a strong push toward electric buses to meet climate goals. The tariff could slow down these transitions, as agencies face higher upfront costs just as they are trying to scale up sustainable transportation options.

The impact won’t be immediate but will grow over time as contracts for new buses come up for renewal. In the long run, the tariffs could cost cities millions of dollars, forcing them to either cut back on services or pass costs directly to residents. For commuters, that could mean fewer buses on the road, longer wait times, and higher fares—an unwelcome development at a time when many cities are trying to encourage public transit use.

Comments