Skip to main content

Featured

Is It Still Worth Buying a Rental Property in Ontario in 2026?

  Published: April 2026 | Reading time: 12 min | Category: Real Estate, Investing, Personal Finance A few years ago the answer seemed obvious. Ontario real estate only went up, rents kept climbing, and landlords looked like geniuses. Then interest rates spiked, prices corrected, rent growth slowed in some markets, and suddenly the question got a lot more complicated. So is buying a rental property in Ontario still a good investment in 2026? The honest answer is: it depends entirely on the numbers, the market, and your personal financial situation. This article gives you the full picture — the real math, the real risks, and a clear framework for deciding whether it makes sense for you. The Case For Rental Property in Ontario in 2026 Before diving into the challenges, here is why real estate remains compelling for long-term investors. Ontario's population is still growing fast Ontario added over 500,000 people in 2023 alone — one of the fastest population growth rates in ...

article

Burqa Stunt in Australian Senate Sparks Fury

 

A burqa is a loose-fitting garment that covers a woman's entire body, featuring a mesh opening for the eyes.

A dramatic scene unfolded in Australia’s Parliament when far-right senator Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, entered the Senate chamber wearing a burqa. The move, widely condemned as racist and disrespectful, was part of Hanson’s ongoing campaign to ban full-face coverings in public spaces.

Hanson donned the garment shortly after being denied permission to introduce a bill outlawing burqas and other face coverings. Her actions immediately provoked outrage among fellow lawmakers, with Muslim senators calling the stunt “disgraceful” and “blatant racism.” Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi accused Hanson of deliberately targeting Muslim communities, while independent senator Fatima Payman described the act as deeply offensive.

The Senate was forced to suspend proceedings after Hanson refused to remove the burqa, an unusual step that underscored the seriousness of the disruption. Senate President Sue Lines eventually ordered Hanson to leave the chamber, and she was barred for the remainder of the day.

This was not Hanson’s first time using the burqa as a political prop. She staged a similar stunt in 2017, also sparking condemnation. Critics argue that such displays are not only disrespectful to Muslim Australians but also undermine parliamentary decorum. Foreign Minister Penny Wong labeled the act “disrespectful,” while Greens leader Larissa Waters said it was “a middle finger to people of faith.”

Hanson defended her actions on social media, accusing colleagues of hypocrisy and insisting she was highlighting security concerns. However, her critics maintain that the stunt was a calculated attempt to inflame division and marginalize Muslim communities.

The incident has reignited debate over religious freedom, multiculturalism, and the boundaries of political protest in Australia. While Hanson’s supporters claim she is raising legitimate concerns, the overwhelming response from Parliament suggests her methods have crossed a line.

Summary: Pauline Hanson’s burqa stunt in the Australian Senate triggered outrage, suspension of proceedings, and accusations of racism, highlighting ongoing tensions over religious freedom and political extremism in the country.

Comments