Skip to main content

Featured

Bank of Canada Rate Decision Tomorrow: What Every Canadian Needs to Know Before June 10

Current Rate 2.25% Held since Oct 2025 Expected Decision HOLD 34/34 economists Announcement 9:45 AM Wed, June 10 (ET) Prime Rate 4.45% Most major lenders On Wednesday morning, June 10, the Bank of Canada will announce its interest rate decision at 9:45 AM ET — and for Canadians with a mortgage, a variable-rate loan, or a renewal coming up, the decision is just two days away. Governor Tiff Macklem will follow with a press conference at 10:30 AM. The short answer: expect no change. But the full picture is considerably more complicated — and the Bank's tone tomorrow could signal whether rate hikes are quietly creeping back onto the table. The Consensus: A Hold, Full Stop The economist community is remarkably united heading into this decision. In a Reuters poll conducted June 2–5, all 34 economists surveyed predicted the Bank would leave its overnight rate at 2.25%. More than 80% said it would stay there for the rest of 2026. "Under normal circumstances, today's sagging econom...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Supreme Court Scrutinizes Trump’s Tariff Powers in Landmark Case

 

                                           The Supreme Court in Capitol Hill in Washington  


In a pivotal legal showdown, the U.S. Supreme Court has raised serious questions about the legality of President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, challenging the extent of presidential authority under a 1977 emergency law. The case marks one of the most consequential tests of executive power in recent history, with potential ramifications for trade policy and constitutional balance.

During oral arguments, justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum expressed skepticism about the administration’s claim that the president can unilaterally impose tariffs without clear congressional oversight. Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, notably questioned whether such broad authority could allow Congress to abdicate its constitutional role in regulating foreign commerce or even declaring war.

The tariffs in question—central to Trump’s second-term economic agenda—have been justified under emergency powers, a rationale that several justices appeared to challenge. While the court has previously shown deference to Trump’s foreign policy decisions, this case has prompted a more rigorous examination of the legal boundaries of executive action.

Legal experts suggest that the outcome could redefine the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches. Although the court’s conservative majority has often sided with Trump, the pointed questioning indicates a potential shift in judicial scrutiny.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, present at the hearing, remained optimistic, stating he was “very, very optimistic” about the outcome. However, if the court rules against the administration, it could curtail the president’s ability to use tariffs as a tool of economic and diplomatic leverage.

The decision, expected in the coming months, will not only impact Trump’s trade strategy but could also set a precedent for future presidents seeking expansive use of emergency powers.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment