Skip to main content

Featured

FIFA World Cup 2026 & Your Wallet: How to Cash In Right Now

  The biggest sporting event in history is happening right now in Canada. Here's what it means for your money — whether you own property, rent, or just want to watch. The 2026 FIFA World Cup kicked off on Canadian soil on June 12 — and whether you've been following the matches or not, this tournament is already leaving a mark on Canadian wallets. Toronto and Vancouver are hosting games through July 19, and the economic ripple effects are very real: in hotels, short-term rentals, restaurants, and yes, your tax return. If you're a homeowner — especially in Toronto or the GTA — there's still time to benefit. And if you're simply a Canadian taxpayer, it's worth knowing exactly what this tournament is costing us, and what we're getting back. Here's everything you need to know about the FIFA World Cup and your money. The Big Picture: What This Tournament Is Worth to Canada FIFA projects that hosting the World Cup will contribute up to CAD $3.8 billion in eco...

article

Supreme Court Scrutinizes Trump’s Tariff Powers in Landmark Case

 

                                           The Supreme Court in Capitol Hill in Washington  


In a pivotal legal showdown, the U.S. Supreme Court has raised serious questions about the legality of President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, challenging the extent of presidential authority under a 1977 emergency law. The case marks one of the most consequential tests of executive power in recent history, with potential ramifications for trade policy and constitutional balance.

During oral arguments, justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum expressed skepticism about the administration’s claim that the president can unilaterally impose tariffs without clear congressional oversight. Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, notably questioned whether such broad authority could allow Congress to abdicate its constitutional role in regulating foreign commerce or even declaring war.

The tariffs in question—central to Trump’s second-term economic agenda—have been justified under emergency powers, a rationale that several justices appeared to challenge. While the court has previously shown deference to Trump’s foreign policy decisions, this case has prompted a more rigorous examination of the legal boundaries of executive action.

Legal experts suggest that the outcome could redefine the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches. Although the court’s conservative majority has often sided with Trump, the pointed questioning indicates a potential shift in judicial scrutiny.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, present at the hearing, remained optimistic, stating he was “very, very optimistic” about the outcome. However, if the court rules against the administration, it could curtail the president’s ability to use tariffs as a tool of economic and diplomatic leverage.

The decision, expected in the coming months, will not only impact Trump’s trade strategy but could also set a precedent for future presidents seeking expansive use of emergency powers.


Comments