Skip to main content

Featured

OAS Payments Are Bigger This July — Here's How Much More You'll Get

  July 21, 2026 If you or someone in your family collects Old Age Security, the deposit landing later this month is larger than the last one. Here's exactly why, and what the new numbers look like. Old Age Security payments went up 1.2% for the July-to-September 2026 quarter — the largest of the four scheduled increases so far this year. Combined with earlier adjustments, that puts OAS 2.3% higher than it was in July 2025. OAS amounts are reviewed every January, April, July, and October to track the Consumer Price Index. When the cost of living rises, the payment rises with it. When it falls, the payment simply holds steady — OAS is protected from ever decreasing. The new maximum monthly amounts Age Group April–June 2026 July–September 2026 Monthly Increase 65 to 74 $743.05 $751.97 +$8.92 75 and older $817.36 $827.17 +$9.81 Seniors 75 and up sit higher because of the permanent 10% top-up the federal government added to that age group's OAS back in July 2022. That bump applies...

article

Controversial U.K. Plan to Send Asylum Seekers to Rwanda Sparks Debate


The British parliament recently passed a law that allows for the deportation of asylum seekers arriving on British shores without prior permission to Rwanda. Here are the key points about this contentious program:

  1. Background and Motivation:

    • The U.K. government’s plan was developed in response to a surge in migrant and asylum seeker arrivals via small boats from France.
    • Local asylum programs in the U.K. have been overwhelmed and underfunded, leading to housing asylum seekers in hotels where they remain unable to work until their claims are processed, which can take years.
    • These hotels cost the government nearly £8 million (approximately $10 million) per day to rent.
  2. The Rwanda Plan:

    • The new policy grants Britain’s immigration authorities the power to send any asylum seeker who entered the U.K. “illegally” after January 2022 to Rwanda.
    • Even if their aim is to claim asylum and they have legitimate grounds to do so, individuals arriving without prior permission can be immediately sent to Rwanda, which is approximately 4,000 miles away in East Africa.
    • Under this law, asylum seekers could be granted refugee status in Rwanda and allowed to stay there.
  3. Controversy and Criticism:

    • The program has faced intense controversy and political wrangling.
    • In November 2023, the U.K. Supreme Court ruled the program unlawful, citing violations of the European Convention on Human Rights. The concern was that genuine refugees might be deported back to their home countries, where they could face harm.
    • Human rights groups and the United Nations refugee agency have condemned the plan.
  4. Royal Assent and Ongoing Debate:

    • The bill now awaits King Charles III’s royal ascent to become an official law.
    • The plan has been criticized by various parties, including King Charles III himself, who reportedly called it “appalling” when it was first proposed.
  5. Recent Tragedy:

    • Hours after the law was passed, French officials reported that at least five people, including a child, drowned in the English Channel while attempting to reach the U.K. on an overcrowded small boat.

In summary, the U.K.'s decision to send asylum seekers to Rwanda remains a highly contentious issue, with strong arguments on both sides. While proponents see it as a deterrent to illegal entry, critics raise concerns about human rights and the safety of vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution. The debate continues as the program awaits final approval from the monarchy.

Comments