Thursday, July 9, 2026 Every July, a wave of federal benefit payments resets for the new benefit year — and 2026 brings one of the biggest shifts in years. Between a permanent 25% boost to the old GST/HST credit, a fresh Canada Child Benefit increase, and the largest quarterly OAS bump of the year, millions of Canadian households will see different numbers land in their accounts this month. Here's what actually changed, and what to check in your own CRA account. The GST/HST Credit Has a New Name — and a Bigger Payout The GST/HST credit has officially been replaced by the Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit (CGEB) . It's not a new program from scratch — it runs on the same CRA infrastructure and eligibility rules — but the payment amounts are 25% higher, and that increase is locked in for five years. The first CGEB payment went out on July 3, 2026. Under the new structure: A single individual with no children can receive up to roughly $679 per year (about $170 per quart...
Background and Motivation:
- The U.K. government’s plan was developed in response to a surge in migrant and asylum seeker arrivals via small boats from France.
- Local asylum programs in the U.K. have been overwhelmed and underfunded, leading to housing asylum seekers in hotels where they remain unable to work until their claims are processed, which can take years.
- These hotels cost the government nearly £8 million (approximately $10 million) per day to rent.
The Rwanda Plan:
- The new policy grants Britain’s immigration authorities the power to send any asylum seeker who entered the U.K. “illegally” after January 2022 to Rwanda.
- Even if their aim is to claim asylum and they have legitimate grounds to do so, individuals arriving without prior permission can be immediately sent to Rwanda, which is approximately 4,000 miles away in East Africa.
- Under this law, asylum seekers could be granted refugee status in Rwanda and allowed to stay there.
Controversy and Criticism:
- The program has faced intense controversy and political wrangling.
- In November 2023, the U.K. Supreme Court ruled the program unlawful, citing violations of the European Convention on Human Rights. The concern was that genuine refugees might be deported back to their home countries, where they could face harm.
- Human rights groups and the United Nations refugee agency have condemned the plan.
Royal Assent and Ongoing Debate:
- The bill now awaits King Charles III’s royal ascent to become an official law.
- The plan has been criticized by various parties, including King Charles III himself, who reportedly called it “appalling” when it was first proposed.
Recent Tragedy:
- Hours after the law was passed, French officials reported that at least five people, including a child, drowned in the English Channel while attempting to reach the U.K. on an overcrowded small boat.
In summary, the U.K.'s decision to send asylum seekers to Rwanda remains a highly contentious issue, with strong arguments on both sides. While proponents see it as a deterrent to illegal entry, critics raise concerns about human rights and the safety of vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution. The debate continues as the program awaits final approval from the monarchy.
Comments
Post a Comment