Skip to main content

Featured

Reaching Your CPP Contribution Maximum: What Workers Need to Know

  Understanding when you’ve hit the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) maximum contribution for the year can save you confusion—and help you make sense of your paycheques as the year goes on. The CPP is designed with an annual limit, meaning once you’ve contributed the maximum required amount, no further CPP deductions should come off your income for the rest of that calendar year. How CPP Contributions Work CPP contributions are based on: Your employment income The year’s maximum pensionable earnings (YMPE) The CPP contribution rate Each year, the federal government sets: A maximum amount of income on which CPP contributions apply (the YMPE) The maximum total contribution you and your employer must make Once your income reaches that threshold, your contributions stop automatically. How to Know You’ve Reached the Maximum Here are the simplest ways to tell: Check your pay stub Your pay stub shows year‑to‑date CPP contributions. Compare this number to the annual maximum ...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Starbucks Challenges Labor Agency in Supreme Court Case


In a significant legal battle, Starbucks is facing off against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case centers around the company’s decision to fire seven workers who were actively involved in unionization efforts at a Tennessee store. Here are the key details:

  1. Background:

    • After Starbucks dismissed the seven workers for their unionization activities, the NLRB obtained a court order requiring the company to rehire them.
    • Now, Starbucks is seeking to limit the government’s power in such cases by challenging the NLRB’s actions.

  2. Supreme Court Hearing:

    • Justices are scheduled to hear Starbucks’ case against the NLRB.
    • If the court rules in favor of Starbucks, it could make it more difficult for the NLRB to intervene when it alleges corporate interference in unionization efforts.

  3. The Controversy:

    • Starbucks argues that the NLRB’s standards for requesting temporary injunctions against companies lack consistency across federal appeals courts.
    • Temporary injunctions can be burdensome for companies, as the NLRB’s administrative process can take years.

  4. Current Status:

    • Five of the seven workers involved in the case are still employed at the Memphis store, while the other two remain committed to the organizing effort.
    • The Memphis store voted to unionize in June 2022, but no labor agreement has been reached with Starbucks for any of the 420 company-owned U.S. stores that have voted to unionize since late 2021.

  5. Looking Ahead:

    • The hearing comes at a time when relations between Starbucks and Workers United (the union representing its workers) have improved. Both sides have resumed talks with the goal of reaching contract agreements this year.
    • The Supreme Court’s decision could have broader implications for labor rights and corporate accountability in unionization efforts.

In summary, Starbucks’ legal battle with the NLRB highlights the tension between corporate interests and workers’ rights. The outcome of this case could shape future labor disputes and the role of federal agencies in protecting employees’ right to organize.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment