Skip to main content

Featured

Weekly Market Snapshot: Mideast Tensions and Chip Selloff Rattle Global Markets (July 13–17)

  Week of July 13–17, 2026 It was a rough week to be a tech investor and a good week to own oil. Escalating conflict between the US and Iran pushed crude sharply higher and rattled global markets, while a fresh wave of selling in semiconductor stocks dragged US and Asian indices lower. Closer to home, the Bank of Canada held its key rate steady, and the TSX—less exposed to chipmakers—held up noticeably better than its US and Asian peers. Here’s how the week broke down across every major market, and what it means for your wallet. 🇨🇦 Canada: TSX Day Close Change Mon, Jul 13 35,252.72 -0.15% Wed, Jul 15 (BoC day) 35,416.20 +0.27% Thu, Jul 16 35,340.15 -0.21% Fri, Jul 17 ~35,262 -0.22% Week total (Fri-to-Fri) — ~flat (about -0.1%) The TSX had a choppy but ultimately quiet week compared with its global peers. Monday's session opened with the Strait of Hormuz blockade headlines and closed lower. Wednesday brought a relief rally after the Bank of Canada's rate hold, with financials ...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Starbucks Challenges Labor Agency in Supreme Court Case


In a significant legal battle, Starbucks is facing off against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case centers around the company’s decision to fire seven workers who were actively involved in unionization efforts at a Tennessee store. Here are the key details:

  1. Background:

    • After Starbucks dismissed the seven workers for their unionization activities, the NLRB obtained a court order requiring the company to rehire them.
    • Now, Starbucks is seeking to limit the government’s power in such cases by challenging the NLRB’s actions.

  2. Supreme Court Hearing:

    • Justices are scheduled to hear Starbucks’ case against the NLRB.
    • If the court rules in favor of Starbucks, it could make it more difficult for the NLRB to intervene when it alleges corporate interference in unionization efforts.

  3. The Controversy:

    • Starbucks argues that the NLRB’s standards for requesting temporary injunctions against companies lack consistency across federal appeals courts.
    • Temporary injunctions can be burdensome for companies, as the NLRB’s administrative process can take years.

  4. Current Status:

    • Five of the seven workers involved in the case are still employed at the Memphis store, while the other two remain committed to the organizing effort.
    • The Memphis store voted to unionize in June 2022, but no labor agreement has been reached with Starbucks for any of the 420 company-owned U.S. stores that have voted to unionize since late 2021.

  5. Looking Ahead:

    • The hearing comes at a time when relations between Starbucks and Workers United (the union representing its workers) have improved. Both sides have resumed talks with the goal of reaching contract agreements this year.
    • The Supreme Court’s decision could have broader implications for labor rights and corporate accountability in unionization efforts.

In summary, Starbucks’ legal battle with the NLRB highlights the tension between corporate interests and workers’ rights. The outcome of this case could shape future labor disputes and the role of federal agencies in protecting employees’ right to organize.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment