Skip to main content

Featured

Your lookahead horoscope: January 11, 2026

  IF TODAY IS YOUR BIRTHDAY Affairs of the heart are under excellent stars for the year ahead, so open up to the people you meet along the way and don’t be surprised if one thing leads to another. It’s good that you enjoy your own company but two is never a crowd. ARIES (March 21 - April 20): You may wish you could turn the clock back on some of the decisions you made but don’t be too hard on yourself. This week you will get the chance to make amends and make up with people you fell out with for no good reason. TAURUS (April 21 - May 21): Aim to do something out of the ordinary over the next few days. The presence of Venus, your ruler, in the most exciting area of your chart will smooth your path to success, from where you may even be able to move on to greatness. GEMINI (May 22 - June 21): Easy come, easy go seems to be the cosmic message at the moment and there is a danger you could put your recent good work at risk by making decisions that are a bit wild even by your variable st...

article

Starbucks Challenges Labor Agency in Supreme Court Case


In a significant legal battle, Starbucks is facing off against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case centers around the company’s decision to fire seven workers who were actively involved in unionization efforts at a Tennessee store. Here are the key details:

  1. Background:

    • After Starbucks dismissed the seven workers for their unionization activities, the NLRB obtained a court order requiring the company to rehire them.
    • Now, Starbucks is seeking to limit the government’s power in such cases by challenging the NLRB’s actions.
  2. Supreme Court Hearing:

    • Justices are scheduled to hear Starbucks’ case against the NLRB.
    • If the court rules in favor of Starbucks, it could make it more difficult for the NLRB to intervene when it alleges corporate interference in unionization efforts.
  3. The Controversy:

    • Starbucks argues that the NLRB’s standards for requesting temporary injunctions against companies lack consistency across federal appeals courts.
    • Temporary injunctions can be burdensome for companies, as the NLRB’s administrative process can take years.
  4. Current Status:

    • Five of the seven workers involved in the case are still employed at the Memphis store, while the other two remain committed to the organizing effort.
    • The Memphis store voted to unionize in June 2022, but no labor agreement has been reached with Starbucks for any of the 420 company-owned U.S. stores that have voted to unionize since late 2021.
  5. Looking Ahead:

    • The hearing comes at a time when relations between Starbucks and Workers United (the union representing its workers) have improved. Both sides have resumed talks with the goal of reaching contract agreements this year.
    • The Supreme Court’s decision could have broader implications for labor rights and corporate accountability in unionization efforts.

In summary, Starbucks’ legal battle with the NLRB highlights the tension between corporate interests and workers’ rights. The outcome of this case could shape future labor disputes and the role of federal agencies in protecting employees’ right to organize.

Comments