Skip to main content

Featured

RDSP: A Complex Pathway to Long-Term Security

  The Registered Disability Savings Plan (RDSP) is often described as one of Canada’s most powerful yet underutilized financial tools. Designed to help people with disabilities and their families save for the future, the RDSP comes with unique benefits that make its administrative hurdles worthwhile. At its core, the RDSP offers two major advantages: Government Grants and Bonds : Eligible contributions can be matched by the federal government through generous grants, and low-income beneficiaries may also qualify for bonds—even without personal contributions. Tax-Deferred Growth : Investments inside the RDSP grow tax-free until funds are withdrawn, allowing savings to compound over time. The paperwork, eligibility rules, and withdrawal restrictions can feel daunting. Families often face challenges navigating the application process, understanding contribution limits, and planning around complex withdrawal rules. Yet, for those who persist, the payoff is significant: thousands...

article

Ex-Prosecutor Identifies Game-Changing Testimony in Trump’s Hush Money Trial


In a dramatic turn of events during the trial related to hush money payments, former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner highlighted a piece of testimony that could haunt Donald Trump. The trial centers around allegations that Trump falsified business documents to conceal payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

On election night in 2016, attorney Keith Davidson, who represented Stormy Daniels at the time, texted then-National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard with a revealing question: “What have we done?” This message came as it became increasingly apparent that Trump would win the election. The Enquirer had also engaged in a “catch and kill” initiative to bury potentially damaging stories about Trump.

Kirschner described this testimony as “breathtaking” and emphasized that it directly undermines one of Trump’s key defense assertions. Davidson’s acknowledgment of his actions potentially impacting the election result suggests that they recognized the damage caused by their conduct. Moreover, it’s clear that the hush money payments were intended to influence the election, not merely to conceal information from Melania or Trump’s family.

This revelation could have far-reaching consequences for Trump’s criminal responsibility. It challenges the defense’s attempts to distance Trump from any wrongdoing. As the trial unfolds, the impact of this admission remains to be seen.


Comments