Skip to main content

Featured

RRSP vs TFSA vs FHSA — Which Should You Prioritize in 2026?

  Published: April 2026 | Reading time: 11 min | Category: Investing, Personal Finance, Tax Savings Three registered accounts. Three sets of rules. And most Canadians are using at least one of them wrong. The RRSP, TFSA, and FHSA each offer powerful tax advantages — but they work in completely different ways, and the right priority order depends entirely on your income, your goals, and your timeline. Picking the wrong one first can cost you thousands in taxes over your lifetime. This guide breaks down exactly how each account works, who it's best for, and the optimal contribution strategy for 2026 based on your situation. A Quick Overview of All Three Accounts Before diving into strategy, here's how each account actually works: RRSP TFSA FHSA Contribution deductible? Yes No Yes Growth taxed? No No No Withdrawals taxed? Yes (as income) No No (if for a first home) 2026 annual limit 18% of income, max $32,490 $7,000 $8,000 Lifetime li...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Ex-Prosecutor Identifies Game-Changing Testimony in Trump’s Hush Money Trial


In a dramatic turn of events during the trial related to hush money payments, former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner highlighted a piece of testimony that could haunt Donald Trump. The trial centers around allegations that Trump falsified business documents to conceal payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

On election night in 2016, attorney Keith Davidson, who represented Stormy Daniels at the time, texted then-National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard with a revealing question: “What have we done?” This message came as it became increasingly apparent that Trump would win the election. The Enquirer had also engaged in a “catch and kill” initiative to bury potentially damaging stories about Trump.

Kirschner described this testimony as “breathtaking” and emphasized that it directly undermines one of Trump’s key defense assertions. Davidson’s acknowledgment of his actions potentially impacting the election result suggests that they recognized the damage caused by their conduct. Moreover, it’s clear that the hush money payments were intended to influence the election, not merely to conceal information from Melania or Trump’s family.

This revelation could have far-reaching consequences for Trump’s criminal responsibility. It challenges the defense’s attempts to distance Trump from any wrongdoing. As the trial unfolds, the impact of this admission remains to be seen.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment