Skip to main content

Featured

CUSMA Wasn’t Renewed: The 10-Year Clock Now Running on Your Job, Prices and Savings

  Canadian Money Brief | Feature CUSMA Wasn't Renewed: The 10-Year Clock Now Running on Your Job, Prices and Savings By MoneySavings.ca | Published November 2, 2026 Quick quiz: is Canada's free trade deal with the United States still in place? The honest answer is yes and no. The agreement known here as CUSMA is still in force, but since July 1 it has been on a different footing, and the way it plays out over the next decade matters to your paycheque, your grocery bill and your savings. Most of us missed the moment because nothing visibly changed that day. That is exactly why it deserves a closer look, especially with the federal budget arriving Thursday. The short version: CUSMA did not end. It moved from a long-term deal to a deal that gets reviewed every year until 2036. Roughly 90% of what Canada sells to the U.S. has been crossing the border tariff-free because of it, so each annual review is a chance for that protection to be tested. For households, this is a slow-burn r...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity: Key Implications for Donald Trump

 

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on immunity has significant implications for presidential power and accountability. Here are some key facts from the ruling:

  1. Presidential Immunity: The majority ruling states that presidents, including former President Donald Trump, have immunity from criminal prosecution when carrying out “official acts.” However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision is based on the constitutional separation of powers and the nature of presidential authority.

  2. Partisan Split: The ruling fell along partisan lines, with the six conservative justices voting in favor of immunity and the three liberal justices dissenting.

  3. Impact on Trump: In the short term, this ruling almost certainly helps Trump avoid further trials before the 2024 general election. The case has been sent back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to determine which elements of the indictment count as official and unofficial acts. Trump can use this opinion as a defense.

  4. Campaign Trail: Given the ongoing presidential campaign, this issue is likely to be a topic of discussion. Both political parties have raised concerns about perceived abuses of presidential power.

  5. Public Perception: By stating that presidents are not immune from prosecution for personal acts, the court emphasizes that the highest office in the land is subject to the same legal standards as everyone else.

In summary, the ruling creates a balance between immunity for official acts and accountability for personal conduct, impacting Trump’s pending criminal cases and shaping the public’s view of presidential power. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment