Skip to main content

Featured

Understanding Your TFSA Contribution Room in 2026

A Tax‑Free Savings Account (TFSA) is one of Canada’s most flexible and powerful savings tools, but figuring out your exact contribution room can feel like solving a puzzle. A clear breakdown makes it much easier. How TFSA Contribution Room Works Your available room is made up of three parts: Annual TFSA limit for the current year Unused contribution room from previous years Withdrawals from previous years (added back the following January) For 2026, the annual TFSA limit is $7,000 . Step‑by‑Step: How to Calculate Your Room Use this simple formula: [ \text{TFSA Room} = \text{Unused Room from Prior Years} + \text{Current Year Limit} + \text{Withdrawals from Last Year} ] A quick example: Unused room from past years: $18,000 2026 limit: $7,000 Withdrawals made in 2025: $4,000 [ \text{Total Room} = 18,000 + 7,000 + 4,000 = 29,000 ] That means you could contribute $29,000 in 2026 without penalty. A Few Helpful Notes Over‑contributions lead to penalties, so it’s worth...

article

Diplomacy or Defiance? Bob Rae’s Fox News Tariff Critique Sparks Conservative Outrage

 


In a recent Fox News interview, Canada's Ambassador to the United Nations, Bob Rae, delivered a sharp critique of President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs. Rae argued that leveraging tariffs as a political tool is not only irresponsible but could also destabilize international trade relationships. His comments, which have been labeled “outrageous” by U.S. conservatives, have ignited a fierce debate over the appropriate role of tariffs in economic policy.

Rae’s criticism centered on the notion that tariffs should not be employed as a bargaining chip in political maneuvering. Instead, he emphasized that economic measures must focus on long-term stability and fairness in global trade, rather than serving short-term political interests. This stance has struck a nerve among conservative commentators in the United States, who view his remarks as undermining the legitimacy of current trade policies and bolstering critics of President Trump’s approach.

The fallout from the interview reflects deep partisan divisions regarding trade policy. While Rae’s supporters applaud his call for a more principled and strategic approach to tariffs, detractors argue that his criticism could weaken the U.S. negotiating position on the global stage. As debates over economic strategy continue to simmer, this controversy underscores the challenges inherent in balancing political objectives with sound economic policy.


Comments