Skip to main content

Featured

5 Things to Know Today — September 28, 2026

  Monday, September 28, 2026  |  MoneySavings.ca Iran rejects Trump's terms for Hormuz, the US alcohol ban on Canadian goods kicks in tomorrow, the loonie posts its 13th straight losing session, Tuesday brings a key GDP print, and Ottawa quietly narrowed the federal deficit. Here's what it all means for your wallet today. 01 OF 05 🛢️ Iran Digs In on Hormuz — Trump Rejected the Deal, and Oil Stays Elevated Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi offered over the weekend to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days — the same terms attached to the June Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding that collapsed in early July. The conditions: the US lifts its naval blockade on Iranian ports, waives sanctions on Iranian oil sales, and observes a broader ceasefire. Trump rejected the offer outright on Saturday, calling it a play by a country that is "losing badly," and renaming the strait "Trump Strait" on Truth Social for good measure. As of this morning, Iran ...

article

Diplomacy or Defiance? Bob Rae’s Fox News Tariff Critique Sparks Conservative Outrage

 


In a recent Fox News interview, Canada's Ambassador to the United Nations, Bob Rae, delivered a sharp critique of President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs. Rae argued that leveraging tariffs as a political tool is not only irresponsible but could also destabilize international trade relationships. His comments, which have been labeled “outrageous” by U.S. conservatives, have ignited a fierce debate over the appropriate role of tariffs in economic policy.

Rae’s criticism centered on the notion that tariffs should not be employed as a bargaining chip in political maneuvering. Instead, he emphasized that economic measures must focus on long-term stability and fairness in global trade, rather than serving short-term political interests. This stance has struck a nerve among conservative commentators in the United States, who view his remarks as undermining the legitimacy of current trade policies and bolstering critics of President Trump’s approach.

The fallout from the interview reflects deep partisan divisions regarding trade policy. While Rae’s supporters applaud his call for a more principled and strategic approach to tariffs, detractors argue that his criticism could weaken the U.S. negotiating position on the global stage. As debates over economic strategy continue to simmer, this controversy underscores the challenges inherent in balancing political objectives with sound economic policy.


Comments