Skip to main content

Featured

Premiers Split on Using Potash as a Trade Weapon — What It Means for Your Grocery Bill

  Published August 31, 2026 Canada's premiers can't agree on how far to take the trade war with the United States — and this week, the fight is over a grey mineral mined almost 2,000 kilometres from Ottawa: potash. The disagreement matters well beyond provincial politics. Potash is the "P" and "K" of fertilizer economics — a key ingredient in the blends that grow the wheat, canola, and corn that eventually show up as bread, canola oil, and everything fed to livestock. Canada supplies about 85% of the potash the U.S. uses, which is exactly why some premiers see it as leverage — and why others are warning that pulling that lever could backfire on the very provinces pushing for it. Ford wants to pull the lever. Moe and Smith are warning not to. Ontario Premier Doug Ford is pushing for the toughest response available, including resource-based leverage. Saskatchewan's Scott Moe and Alberta's Danielle Smith are pumping the brakes, warning that squeezing po...

article

Diplomacy or Defiance? Bob Rae’s Fox News Tariff Critique Sparks Conservative Outrage

 


In a recent Fox News interview, Canada's Ambassador to the United Nations, Bob Rae, delivered a sharp critique of President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs. Rae argued that leveraging tariffs as a political tool is not only irresponsible but could also destabilize international trade relationships. His comments, which have been labeled “outrageous” by U.S. conservatives, have ignited a fierce debate over the appropriate role of tariffs in economic policy.

Rae’s criticism centered on the notion that tariffs should not be employed as a bargaining chip in political maneuvering. Instead, he emphasized that economic measures must focus on long-term stability and fairness in global trade, rather than serving short-term political interests. This stance has struck a nerve among conservative commentators in the United States, who view his remarks as undermining the legitimacy of current trade policies and bolstering critics of President Trump’s approach.

The fallout from the interview reflects deep partisan divisions regarding trade policy. While Rae’s supporters applaud his call for a more principled and strategic approach to tariffs, detractors argue that his criticism could weaken the U.S. negotiating position on the global stage. As debates over economic strategy continue to simmer, this controversy underscores the challenges inherent in balancing political objectives with sound economic policy.


Comments