Skip to main content

Featured

U.S.–Iran Strikes Escalate: What It Means for Your Gas Bill and Savings

  ⚡ BREAKING · MAY 8, 2026 By MoneySavings.ca Editorial Team   |  May 8, 2026  |  5 min read The Strait of Hormuz, photographed from space. Approximately 20% of the world's oil supply passes through this narrow waterway. (Image: NASA / Public Domain) American warships were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz on May 7, 2026 — and the U.S. military fired back hard, striking Iranian ports at Qeshm and Bandar Abbas. For Canadians, this isn't just a distant war story. It's a pocketbook issue. 20% of global oil transits the Strait of Hormuz every day $94 projected WTI crude price per barrel if closure continues (CEPR, 2026) 5% of normal shipping traffic still moving through the Strait What Happened — and When The crisis didn't begin overnight. On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iran, targeting nuclear infrastructure and senior military leadership — including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who was killed in the strik...

article

Diplomacy or Defiance? Bob Rae’s Fox News Tariff Critique Sparks Conservative Outrage

 


In a recent Fox News interview, Canada's Ambassador to the United Nations, Bob Rae, delivered a sharp critique of President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs. Rae argued that leveraging tariffs as a political tool is not only irresponsible but could also destabilize international trade relationships. His comments, which have been labeled “outrageous” by U.S. conservatives, have ignited a fierce debate over the appropriate role of tariffs in economic policy.

Rae’s criticism centered on the notion that tariffs should not be employed as a bargaining chip in political maneuvering. Instead, he emphasized that economic measures must focus on long-term stability and fairness in global trade, rather than serving short-term political interests. This stance has struck a nerve among conservative commentators in the United States, who view his remarks as undermining the legitimacy of current trade policies and bolstering critics of President Trump’s approach.

The fallout from the interview reflects deep partisan divisions regarding trade policy. While Rae’s supporters applaud his call for a more principled and strategic approach to tariffs, detractors argue that his criticism could weaken the U.S. negotiating position on the global stage. As debates over economic strategy continue to simmer, this controversy underscores the challenges inherent in balancing political objectives with sound economic policy.


Comments