Skip to main content

Featured

The Fed Decides Wednesday — Here's What It Means for Your Mortgage, the Loonie, and Your RRSP

  Monday, July 27, 2026 The U.S. Federal Reserve hands down its rate decision at 2 p.m. ET on July 29. For most Canadians it will feel like background noise. It isn't — here's the plain-language version of why it touches your mortgage, your cross-border spending, and whatever's sitting in your RRSP. The short version: Markets are pricing roughly a two-in-three chance the Fed holds its rate at 3.50%–3.75% on Wednesday. That's not the story. The story is that this is one of the least certain "sure thing" holds in years — and Chair Kevin Warsh's press conference at 2:30 p.m. ET could matter more than the decision itself. Why this meeting is different The Fed has held its benchmark rate steady at 3.50%–3.75% through every meeting so far in 2026. On paper, Wednesday should be more of the same. Under the hood, it's messier. Persistent inflation, running well above the Fed's 2% target for a fifth straight year, has kept a rate hike on the table. The oil-...

article

Diplomacy or Defiance? Bob Rae’s Fox News Tariff Critique Sparks Conservative Outrage

 


In a recent Fox News interview, Canada's Ambassador to the United Nations, Bob Rae, delivered a sharp critique of President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs. Rae argued that leveraging tariffs as a political tool is not only irresponsible but could also destabilize international trade relationships. His comments, which have been labeled “outrageous” by U.S. conservatives, have ignited a fierce debate over the appropriate role of tariffs in economic policy.

Rae’s criticism centered on the notion that tariffs should not be employed as a bargaining chip in political maneuvering. Instead, he emphasized that economic measures must focus on long-term stability and fairness in global trade, rather than serving short-term political interests. This stance has struck a nerve among conservative commentators in the United States, who view his remarks as undermining the legitimacy of current trade policies and bolstering critics of President Trump’s approach.

The fallout from the interview reflects deep partisan divisions regarding trade policy. While Rae’s supporters applaud his call for a more principled and strategic approach to tariffs, detractors argue that his criticism could weaken the U.S. negotiating position on the global stage. As debates over economic strategy continue to simmer, this controversy underscores the challenges inherent in balancing political objectives with sound economic policy.


Comments