Skip to main content

Featured

The Best No-Fee Credit Cards in Canada for 2026

Why pay an annual fee when you don't have to? Canada's best no-fee credit cards now rival many premium cards — offering serious cash back, flexible rewards, travel perks, and even insurance coverage, all for $0 per year . We've rounded up the top picks for 2026 so your wallet works harder without costing you a cent. Whether you want maximum cash back on dining and groceries, a flat-rate card that keeps things simple, or travel-friendly features like no foreign transaction fees, there's a no-fee card for you. Here are our top picks — and who each one is best for. Quick Comparison: Top No-Fee Cards at a Glance Card Best For Top Earn Rate Network Simplii Financial Cash Back Visa Dining & Everyday 4% restaurants Visa Tangerine Money-Back Mastercard Flexible Spenders 2% chosen categories Mastercard Rogers Red World Elite Mastercard Rogers / Travel 2% all purchases* Mastercard Amex SimplyCash® Card Simple Flat Rate 2% gas & grocery Amex BMO CashBack® Mastercard Grocer...

article

New Diplomacy on the Horizon: U.S. and Russia Push Ahead Without Ukraine

 

In a bold shift from previous diplomatic efforts, top U.S. and Russian officials have agreed to advance negotiations aimed at ending the war in Ukraine—even as Ukrainian representatives remain notably absent. High-level talks held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, saw U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov discussing the framework for future peace negotiations and steps toward restoring bilateral relations.

The Trump administration’s approach, which prioritizes direct engagement with Moscow, marks a departure from longstanding principles that insisted on “nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.” Critics in Kyiv have voiced strong opposition. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned that any agreement reached without Ukraine’s participation would be unacceptable and would undermine the nation’s sovereignty. European leaders echoed these concerns, with several officials labeling the move as a dangerous precedent that could lead to a “dirty deal” and embolden further Russian demands.

Analysts note that the absence of Ukraine from the negotiation table reflects a transactional mindset, one that appears to value immediate economic and strategic concessions over the long-term security guarantees essential for lasting peace. While U.S. officials are optimistic—citing the talks as a “highly productive” first step—the outcome remains uncertain. Critics argue that sidelining Ukraine could ultimately sacrifice key security interests and further destabilize an already volatile region.

For now, the dialogue is only the opening chapter in what promises to be a complex and protracted negotiation process. As both sides prepare for further discussions, the international community watches closely, aware that the stakes extend far beyond bilateral U.S.–Russia relations and into the broader security architecture of Europe.


Comments