Skip to main content

Featured

How Tariffs Are Affecting Your Grocery Bill (And What You Can Do About It)

If your grocery bill has been giving you sticker shock lately, you're not imagining things — and you're definitely not alone. Millions of Canadians across the country are opening their wallets wider at the checkout, and a big part of the reason can be traced back to one word: tariffs . In this post, we break down exactly what's been happening, how much it's costing you, which foods are hit hardest, and — most importantly — what you can do right now to protect your budget . 💡 Quick Stat: Canada's Food Price Report 2026 predicts a family of four will spend roughly $17,572 on groceries this year — nearly $1,000 more than last year.  What Happened? A Quick Timeline The grocery price squeeze didn't happen overnight. Here's the short version of what led us here: Early 2025: U.S. President Donald Trump imposed broad tariffs on Canadian goods entering the United States, rattling our export-heavy economy. March 2025: Canada fired back with 25% counter-tariffs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Provincial Directive Curbs AHS Authority Over Private Surgical Contract Negotiations

 


In a significant policy shift, Alberta Health Minister Adriana LaGrange has stripped Alberta Health Services (AHS) of its authority to negotiate contracts with private surgical facilities. According to a government directive obtained by media, the change came after internal concerns—raised by the agency’s then-chief executive—over rising contract costs.

Documents, including a letter from former AHS CEO Athana Mentzelopoulos’s lawyer, allege that senior government officials—even involving Premier Danielle Smith’s former chief of staff—intervened in AHS’s procurement process to favor private companies. This interference reportedly undermined AHS’s established negotiation powers and raised serious questions about transparency in the province’s health system. 

A separate report in a Morning Update from Unpublished Newswire reiterated the move, noting that the directive is part of broader reforms aimed at reducing costs by leveraging competitive pricing in surgical services.  Meanwhile, a CityNews investigation has added context to the controversy, citing denials by private surgical providers who label the allegations of sweetheart deals as “false and baseless.” 

Critics and opposition leaders are calling for further inquiry into the decision-making process behind these changes, arguing that the shift could signal a move toward greater privatization of public health services. In contrast, government representatives insist that the directive is intended solely to improve efficiency and ensure more competitive pricing for publicly funded operations.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment