Skip to main content

Featured

Rental Property Expenses Canadians Forget to Claim (2026 Guide)

  Published: April 2026 | Reading time: 9 min | Category: Real Estate, Tax Savings, Personal Finance Owning a rental property in Canada comes with a surprisingly generous set of tax deductions — but most landlords only claim the obvious ones. Mortgage interest, property taxes, insurance. Done. What they miss is often worth thousands of dollars in additional deductions every single year. If you own a rental property in Ontario (or anywhere in Canada), this guide walks through every legitimate expense category the CRA allows — including the ones your accountant may not have mentioned. Why This Matters More Than You Think Rental income in Canada is taxed as regular income — meaning at your full marginal rate. At Ontario's combined federal and provincial rates, landlords earning $100,000–$150,000 total income are paying 43% on every dollar of net rental profit. Every $1,000 in legitimate deductions you miss costs you approximately $430 in real taxes . A landlord who forget...

article

Judge Criticizes Trump Administration Over Venezuela Deportations

A U.S. federal judge has sharply criticized the Trump administration for its handling of deportations involving Venezuelan migrants. The administration's response to a judicial request for detailed information on deportation flights was deemed "woefully insufficient." This comes amid allegations that the administration may have violated a court order temporarily blocking the deportations.

The controversy centers on the use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which the administration invoked to expedite the removal of alleged gang members. Critics, including the American Civil Liberties Union, argue that the law is being misapplied, as it historically pertains to wartime scenarios. The judge has demanded further clarification on the timing and details of the flights, raising concerns about potential constitutional violations if the administration defies judicial decisions.

This case highlights the ongoing tension between the executive and judicial branches, as well as the broader implications for immigration policy and the rule of law. The administration has until next week to provide additional explanations, as the legal battle continues to unfold.

Comments