Skip to main content

Featured

Wall Street Braces as Tech Rout Deepens

US markets looked set for another turbulent session as futures for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq pointed lower, signaling continued pressure on the tech sector. A wave of selling has swept through major technology names this week, and Thursday’s pre‑market action suggested the downturn isn’t over yet. Alphabet remained a major drag after its sharp slide, with investors reacting to concerns about rising AI‑related spending and the uncertain payoff timeline. The pullback has added to broader anxiety across the sector, where valuations have been tested by shifting expectations around growth and profitability. Amazon now sits in the spotlight as traders await its upcoming earnings report. With sentiment already fragile, the company’s results could either steady the market or accelerate the sell‑off, depending on how its cloud and retail segments perform. Commodities also reflected the risk‑off mood. Silver prices tumbled, extending a recent decline and underscoring the cautious tone acros...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Supreme Court Decision Sparks Debate Over Alien Enemies Act


The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of former President Donald Trump, allowing the use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members. This decision, made in a 5-4 vote, has reignited discussions about the application of this wartime law in modern times.

The Alien Enemies Act, historically employed during wartime, grants the president authority to deport individuals deemed a national security risk. Trump's administration invoked this law to expedite the deportation of members of the Tren de Aragua gang. However, the court emphasized that detainees must be given notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal through habeas corpus claims.

Critics argue that the law's application in this context exceeds its intended scope, as it was designed for wartime scenarios involving foreign governments. Supporters, however, view the decision as a victory for national security and presidential authority.

The ruling has sparked legal and ethical debates, with dissenting justices questioning the legitimacy of using the Alien Enemies Act for non-state actors like gangs. The case continues to highlight tensions between executive power and judicial oversight in immigration policy.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment