Skip to main content

Featured

Transatlantic Tensions Shake Global Markets After New Tariff Threats

                                                 The Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) in Greenland Global markets faltered as fresh tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump reignited fears of a renewed trade clash between Washington and key European partners. The announcement targeted several EU nations and immediately sent shockwaves through equities, currencies, and commodities. European stocks opened sharply lower, with export‑heavy sectors—particularly autos, luxury goods, and industrials—bearing the brunt of the selloff. Major multinational firms saw billions wiped from their market value within hours as investors braced for potential retaliatory measures from Brussels. The proposed tariffs, set to begin at 10% and potentially rise to 25% later in the year, stem from escalating geopolitical disagreements that have st...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Supreme Court Decision Sparks Debate Over Alien Enemies Act


The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of former President Donald Trump, allowing the use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members. This decision, made in a 5-4 vote, has reignited discussions about the application of this wartime law in modern times.

The Alien Enemies Act, historically employed during wartime, grants the president authority to deport individuals deemed a national security risk. Trump's administration invoked this law to expedite the deportation of members of the Tren de Aragua gang. However, the court emphasized that detainees must be given notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal through habeas corpus claims.

Critics argue that the law's application in this context exceeds its intended scope, as it was designed for wartime scenarios involving foreign governments. Supporters, however, view the decision as a victory for national security and presidential authority.

The ruling has sparked legal and ethical debates, with dissenting justices questioning the legitimacy of using the Alien Enemies Act for non-state actors like gangs. The case continues to highlight tensions between executive power and judicial oversight in immigration policy.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment