Skip to main content

Featured

Where to Find the Best Savings and GIC Rates in Canada This Week

Canadians looking to stretch their savings a little further still have access to competitive high‑interest savings accounts (HISAs) and guaranteed investment certificates (GICs). Digital banks continue to lead the way, offering strong returns without sacrificing security. Here’s a quick snapshot of the top rates available this week. Highest High‑Interest Savings Account Rates Several online‑only institutions are offering some of the most attractive HISA rates right now: Saven Financial – 2.85% Oaken Financial – 2.80% EQ Bank – 2.75% Bridgewater Bank – 2.70% WealthONE Bank – 2.60% These accounts are typically insured either federally or provincially, giving savers both flexibility and peace of mind. Best GIC Rates This Week For those comfortable locking in their money for a set period, GICs continue to provide reliable, guaranteed returns. 1‑Year GIC Leaders Oaken Financial – 3.40% 5‑Year GIC Leaders EQ Bank – 3.85% Longer‑term GICs remain especially appealing for ...
Post a Comment
Read more

article

Labels

Supreme Court Decision Sparks Debate Over Alien Enemies Act


The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of former President Donald Trump, allowing the use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members. This decision, made in a 5-4 vote, has reignited discussions about the application of this wartime law in modern times.

The Alien Enemies Act, historically employed during wartime, grants the president authority to deport individuals deemed a national security risk. Trump's administration invoked this law to expedite the deportation of members of the Tren de Aragua gang. However, the court emphasized that detainees must be given notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal through habeas corpus claims.

Critics argue that the law's application in this context exceeds its intended scope, as it was designed for wartime scenarios involving foreign governments. Supporters, however, view the decision as a victory for national security and presidential authority.

The ruling has sparked legal and ethical debates, with dissenting justices questioning the legitimacy of using the Alien Enemies Act for non-state actors like gangs. The case continues to highlight tensions between executive power and judicial oversight in immigration policy.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment